| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 31 post(s) |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
5184
|
Posted - 2015.04.21 21:14:21 -
[1] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:This is pretty cool to be finally happening. That said I'm still not feeling much desire to invest since the ships I actually fly (mostly tech 2 ships) seem to still lack options.
Another issue that comes to mind, is there a way to have owned ships become skins to be sold rather than applied other than putting them in a corp hangar?
They're going to be dropped into your redemption queue, so you can then redeem them and sell them?
Quote:Skinned ships will become a base version of the same and a SKIN item for that skin will be added to the owning players redeeming queue. For example: If you have a Megathron Quafe Edition you will get a standard Megathron in the same location as the original, and 1 Megathron Quafe SKIN (Permanent) item placed in your redeeming queue.
Woo! CSM X!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
5184
|
Posted - 2015.04.21 21:53:11 -
[2] - Quote
Tristan Valentina wrote:Multiple Blue posts on first page continuing to page 4.
Someone mentions money and the blues all run away.
CCP I know you are watching this please get out in front of this pricing issue with at least a statement giving some real reasoning besides market Hocus Pocus.
Someone get cookies to lure them out!
Tristan
Well, their last post was 18:35 their time. How late do you expect them to stay at work? 
Woo! CSM X!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
5185
|
Posted - 2015.04.21 23:48:11 -
[3] - Quote
Destoya wrote:Kind of disappointed with the prices on a lot of these items.
5000+ aurum might be acceptable for a titan, but asking the same for a tech 1 frigate is frankly pretty ridiculous. Would be one thing if it were that much for all variants of a hull (ex: Merlin, Hawk, and Harpy), but that's obviously not the case . I get that you wanted some skins to be rarer/more premium than others but asking that much for ships that most people dont use past 6 months is kind of distasteful in my opinion.
Most expensive frigate is 4300? (3 at that price point)
Woo! CSM X!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
5188
|
Posted - 2015.04.22 11:53:25 -
[4] - Quote
NekoKitten wrote:How about dropping a time limited skin of a ship that was SKINned by a capsuleer that got destroyed in pvp and ofcourse treated like any loot drop (yes or no said the loot fairy), is that an idea or a terrible one ?
I could see potential farming issues here. Though I guess the time limited could be more limited than the 30 days.
Woo! CSM X!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
5188
|
Posted - 2015.04.22 11:57:44 -
[5] - Quote
OkarasRule wrote:the ORE development edition ships have "market" as their method of getting them... does that mean they will be seeded by npcs?
Market = The only way to get them is to buy them from other players (who got them before, and haven't injected the license)
Woo! CSM X!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
5189
|
Posted - 2015.04.22 17:12:30 -
[6] - Quote
Sojourn wrote:Ned Thomas wrote:Sojourn wrote:"Battleship|Caldari|Scorpion Ishukone Watch|Scorpion Ishukone Watch SKIN (Permanent)|Market"
You're taking away the fact its a rare ship and putting it on the market for all the poors to get their sweaty little mitts on it.
Some people payed billions of ISK for theirs so they could own and fly a rare ship. As a collector this saddens me. Next you will make the Raven State Issue a skin. I'm a confirmed poor. Now that we have that out the way. The LIMITED EDITION SHIP no longer becomes limited edition because it will be a skin that can be applied to your ship constantly over and over again. a) It will lower the price of it. b) Now with it not being lost all the time can be applied to any Scorpion no matter how many times you lose it. A limited edition ship with unlimited uses! The whole point of Eve is that when something is destroyed it's gone... The same with the Rattlesnake Victory Edition. Now you can just go fly it without risking losing the actual ship. Which part of "now there will be unlimited copied of limited edition ships" do you not understand?
There will be X of the ship out there. That X will not increase, or decrease. Still limited edition. (you just can't lose it)
Woo! CSM X!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
5189
|
Posted - 2015.04.22 17:18:31 -
[7] - Quote
Natya Mebelle wrote:Where does a CSM get this information that there will be no further seeding of this item?
By using my leet psychic powers!
(or https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=5687291#post5687291 when I don't want the headache that entails)
Woo! CSM X!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
5199
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 07:25:43 -
[8] - Quote
Oraac Ensor wrote: If you're posting stuff that doesn't display properly in Internet Explorer - possibly the most widely used browser on the planet - you should be ashamed.
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers
http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser-ww-monthly-201403-201504-bar
You sure you don't want to revise your statement? (Oh, and don't be bringing China into this. For the purposes of this discussion, China is irrelevant. Being that they have their own Eve server, and updates)
Aside from that: Whose fault is it that it doesn't work? CCPs, when they're following industry Standards, or Microsoft, when they don't? (Oh god, the times I've wanted to take IE out back and shoot it, because they do things their own way. Or I've been stuck supporting bloody IE6 because people had sites developed with activex)
Woo! CSM X!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
| |
|